BRINGO’ing an end to annoying interactive phone directories

bringo logo

Very cool! This is one of those services I wish had been around years and years ago. I just used Bringo to get through to a customer service agent at United Airlines, and I am impressed.

I am traveling tomorrow down to LA, and I couldn’t find my confirmation number, nor was it on my mileage plus account. I was getting the sinking feeling that I might have forgotten to actually book the flight a couple of months ago. I decided to call United Airlines to see if they had any records of my travel. I called the number, spent about three minutes navigating their phone tree to try to speak with someone, and at the point where the automated voice gave up and was going to transfer me to a human, it hung up. I was about to dial-up again and do the whole routine once more when I remembered a recent TechCrunch article on bringo.com.

Using the service is drop-dead simple:

  • Go to the site and select the company you wish to engage
  • Bringo will then ask for your phone number, and then perform a quick call to that number to verify you are who you say you are. My phone rang immediately, and I simply clicked #.
  • The site immediately acknowledged my confirmation of the number, and began to do the dirty work of calling United Airlines.
  • About 30 seconds later, my phone rang and there was an operator on the other end!

Not only was this a much better experience (I could do work while Bringo worked for me), but United did have my record and all is well.

Great, simple service Bringo…

BRINGO : Stop Talking to Machines and Talk to a Real Human

Success Disaster – Twitter to Jaiku

This is one of those “hope to have” challenges where adoption happens so quickly that the business is unable to keep pace and scale out.  Users, regardless of how compelling the service is,  will only put up with reliability shortcomings for so long.  From the comments, it sounds like users will put up with it for a bit longer, but with alternatives emerging, Twitter needs to scale quickly.
Making The Switch From Twitter to Jaiku

Document Collaboration – more than screensharing a document

The following is a review of Microsoft’s new beta, SharedView. It appears to be an attempt to merge document collaboration with web conferencing’s screen-sharing capabilities. As the review points out, screen-sharing is useful for real-time collaboration, but it limits the collaboration to single-user control over the editing experience. This type of workflow has been supported in web conferencing solutions (including Acrobat Connect) for years…

User research indicates this isn’t enough to solve the distributed document collaboration problem. Google has started to try to address this through Docs and Spreadsheets, along with a variety of other vendors that have recently cropped up in the web 2.0 bubble. Looks like MSFT has a ways to go in order to provide an effective, real-time, document collaboration solution.
First look: Microsoft SharedView beta

The “document collaboration” journey begins for me

I’ve recently taken on responsibility for a couple of new services at Adobe, including CreatePDF and Document Center.  These are both excellent services that provide simple value-propositions for individuals around document collaboration.  Both of these services allow for “try and buy” experiences, which you can sign-up for at the following URLs.  Enjoy, and let me know your feedback about how we can improve these services.
Create PDFs of virtually any file format:

Create Adobe® PDF Online: Easily convert and create PDF documents

and then apply policy-protection for electronic documents (think virtual-shredder, DRM for documents, etc…)

Adobe Document Center 

and of course, I’m still working on Acrobat Connect (web conferencing)

ApolloHunter.com – a place to share Apollo Apps

ApolloHunter.com – a place to share Apollo Apps

This is an interesting site to follow.  List of available early-adopter Apollo-based applications.

Adobe Contribute CS3 and Wordpress

I happen to work at Adobe, so I get to try out as many of the 70+ Adobe products that are available. Today, I installed Contribute CS3 (I’ve previously used an early Beta), and it is a joy to work in. Instantly connected to this blog (which used Wordpress hosted on MediaTemple.net), and I was writing this entry in seconds. Job well done Contribute team…

Random Email Stats…

A wise man once said:  "Don’t confuse motion with progress."  That could also be applied to email volume.  I use X1’s desktop search engine on my work computer, which indexes all of my email/attachments/docs/etc…  I am a pack-rat with email, and have archived every single email I’ve received at my current company.  I was recently in a meeting where we were discussing email proliferation and our reliance on it as a collaboration tool, and I decided to run a couple of queries with X1 to see what my usage looked like.  Here’s this relatively useless, but scary, information:

Range:  From June 2003 – December 5, 2006

Received Email Stats:

  • Total Emails:  130,000 emails
  • Total Emails with attachments:  31,341
  • Top Email Sender (either To or CC’d me):  4194 (and counting)
  • PowerPoint Presentations Sent to me: 1199 (and counting)

Sent Email Stats:

  • Total Emails I’ve Sent:   32,417 emails
  • 2004 Emails Sent:  8704 emails
  • 2005 Emails Sent:  9293 emails
  • 2006 Emails Sent (and counting):  11,332 emails

All of this totals up to about 8GBs of information sitting in several .pst files on my computer.  Does any of this total up to productivity?  Hmmm…

Making the switch…

After years of chastising my brother and any other Mac-head, I’ve made the big switch over to Mac(tel).  At home, I’m using a new iMac for my office, and then a Mini in our bedroom for movie watching (see earlier post re: media pcs).

While home-use is one thing, I just got a MacBook Pro at work, which will be the biggest change.  Couple of reasons for doing so:

  • The ability to run both Mac OS X and XP (via either Bootcamp or Parallels, hopefully VMWare soon) on the same hardware vs. carrying around multiple laptops.
  • Adobe Connect (formally Macromedia Breeze) is a cross-platform solution, so the MacTel provides the opportunity to work with both Mac and Windows on the same hardware.

Couple of things I’m enjoying already:

  • Everything "just works…"  For a long-time Windows-user, this is very strange but enjoyable ;)
  • Smackbook – virtual desktops through a "tap" on the monitor
  • Adium – great piece of software, such a better user experience than native IM clients (won’t name you guys…)
  • The huge list of open source applications I can run on either Mac, XP, or Unix.

For business apps like Office/Outlook, I’m going to still have to rely on the XP instance running on the Mac.  The Mac versions just don’t cut it when working with a large number of users who rely on Office to collaborate.

For software companies/product managers/developers/QA, I really don’t see the point of using any other hardware given the broad platform support you get at the tip of your fingers…

More On-line Presentation Tools…while Presenter celebrates its seventh birthday…

Techcrunch » Blog Archive » Preezo Enters Online Office Race

It’s articles like this that remind to keep in perspective how great the value proposition of Adobe Presenter (formally Macromedia Breeze Presenter) is.  Presenter is the original product within a series of applications that make up what is now called Adobe Connect (formally Macromedia Breeze), and has literally been out in the market since 2000.

When engaging with customers on the Connect/Breeze product line, I end up spending the majority of my time on our web conferencing or training solutions, basically assuming that people “get” the value proposition of being able to take your huge presentation with animations and such, add voice over, and publish it all together as a rich Flash application on the web.  However, every now and then I run into a customer who isn’t aware of this technology, and am reminded through their reactions of what a great concept this is.  Kudos to Keith and Kevin (Presedia founders) for having the vision back then…

Poor Google, the irony…

Did anyone else pickup on the irony of these two entries?

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/